Tag: Louisa board of supervisors

Liberty’s Chrysalis

“The love of power is natural; it is insatiable; almost constantly whetted; and never cloy’d by possession.”

Henry Saint John, 1st Viscount of Bolingbroke

This spring my wife and I planted a small rain garden.  The plantings included several swamp milkweeds, the preferred plant for Monarchs to lay their eggs on.  It’s Latin name is Asclepias incarnata for the serious gardeners out there.  The other day, to our delight, we discovered a dozen monarch caterpillars denuding the milkweeds.  

It took several days for them to consume every leaf.  Fully fueled with toxic bitterness and relatively immune from predation, they slowly wandered off to other plants, leaving the bare stalks of the milkweed as testament to their presence.  One by one they moved on, rambling off into the garden seeking leaves or branches to safely transform into chrysalises.  

Within several days of the caterpillar migration, we spotted two bright green chrysalises hanging under leaves.  A third caterpillar wasn’t quite there yet. We hope that within 14 days, given the mild weather, the caterpillars will be reborn as butterflies.  A well-tended garden brings unexpected joys.

The discovery of the caterpillars reminded me of the words of Henry Saint John, that liberty is like a tender plant.  He penned these words close to 300 years ago and the metaphor could not be more relevant in our time: “liberty is a tender plant which will not flourish unless the genius of the soil be proper for it; nor will any soil continue to be so long, which is not cultivated with incessant care.”  

He wrote these words in the early 18th century, a time of upheaval in England: political factions vying for power in a deadly struggle.  He didn’t always choose wisely, backing the Stuart’s claim to the crown and the ensuing Jacobite Rebellion, ending up in exile in France for some time.  He is most famous, I think, for his essay “The Idea of a Patriot King,” arguing that a King should be above faction.

This idea of a King above faction is important in our own history. It informed how Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, and John Quincy Adams saw the presidency.  A president above faction.  They tried mightily to be above faction, not always successfully, however.  Andrew Jackson threw the notion of a patriot president out a White House window along with the contents of a chamber pot.   

Today, we are ruled by an unsound and troubled president hell bent on hyper factionalizing our country, resorting to violence and armed soldiers patrolling city streets.   He has taken the notion of faction to new extremes in America, not seen since the late 1850s.   This includes sending the military to occupy blue cities to show his political muscle;  flaunting the rule of law; criminally investigating critics; ruling solely by dictate; musing publicly about being a dictator; rewriting our history; engaging in extrajudicial killings on the high seas off Venezuela; and setting the stage to nullify next year’s mid-term election results unfavorable to him.

Our garden of democracy needs tending.  And damn quickly.  

We must steadfastly feed and nourish our democracy.  Stay informed in the face of daily trespassing against our liberty.  Although in today’s world where most Americans get their ‘news’ through social media, ‘informed’ is perhaps obsolete.  There still are reliable news sources out there.  Social media is not one of them.  Social media is an avalanche of computer driven feeds designed to elicit clicks, rage, and profit.  Curate your news sources. Go old fashioned and read books, lots of them.  The more you read, the more you realize how little you actually know about things you thought you knew a great deal about. That’s a good thing.

We must clear out the authoritarian weeds that plague our garden of democracy.  We must elect leaders that reflect our values and are in tune with today’s generation and willing to fight.  The continual reelection of octogenarians does the party no good.  

We must go to the polls this November and elect Abigail Spanberger governor and weed out the noxious plants occupying Virginia’s governor’s mansion.  We must not just elect her but elect her in a historical landslide. We don’t want to become an autocratic state like Texas or Florida. 

We must seed our garden of democracy with plants that are robust and acclimated to our current political reality:  An opposition party bent on one-party authoritarian rule.  We can do that by supporting new faces and ideas in the Democratic party at all levels.  Starting with David Rogers who is running for the Mineral seat in our local board of supervisors.

We must amend the soil of our garden.  Get friends and family to register to vote, get them to the polls on election days.  Attend rallies or local meetings.  Donate to candidates you support.  If you can, canvas for that candidate. Volunteer with the Louisa Democrats.

We must not only resist the orange piped piper of Mar-a-Lago but fight him at every junction.  Write or call your representatives, write the Supreme Court Justices, write our governor.  Tell them your story and how you are impacted by Trump’s dangerous and illegal actions.  That food, housing, and healthcare will be unaffordable and unattainable once the full impact of Trump’s tariffs, deportation of farm and food processing workers, and regressive taxes are felt.   

Plant a garden an act of subversion against Trump’s war on climate science.  Whether you have only a south facing front door stoop, a small balcony, or quarter acre, or ten acres, plant a garden in the dirt or in pots.  Every plant you grow feeds or houses an insect or animal and soaks up carbon.  Get radical and grow a victory garden.

Our garden of democracy is in big trouble, but with our incessant care and nourishment our democracy can flourish once again.  Together we must tend the garden of democracy and create the space and time to protect and nurture liberty’s chrysalis from Trump’s insatiable drive to possess absolute power. 

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

For three plus years my wife and I were volunteer repair program managers for Charlottesville’s Habitat for Humanity program in Louisa.  The repair program primarily focused on ensuring folks could safely get in and out of their homes.  This included repairing or replacing decks or stoops and stairs, replacing or repairing exterior doors, installing ramps.  We also replaced or fixed window, siding, soffits, gutters, and the occasional roof.  The work was all done by volunteers.  One year I put 2500 miles on my truck supporting Habitat projects, which reflects the demand for housing aid in Louisa County.

Whether or not a project went forward after the initial survey and scope of work was completed, depended on the client’s income.  They had to make at or less than 50 percent of the average marginal income for the county.   Our typical client was female, over 65, widowed, earning between $8 to $24K per year.  The bulk of that from Social Security.  To say the least, they struggled to keep maintain their homes.  Most had worked their entire adult lives yet have economically drifted downwards into poverty once they can work no longer.  

No defined pensions, marginal savings if any.  The only wealth they have was tied up in their home and land, but without being able to maintain the home or land, its value shrinks.  Given the absence of affordable housing in the county, the elderly who want to maintain their independence and local connections have two basic choices:  Sell and move out of the county or stay in a decaying home.  The Fluvanna-Louisa Housing Foundation is working solutions for this conundrum of Louisa’s elderly, pulling an indifferent Board of Supervisors along with it.

The reasons for the statistic regarding our primary clients are myriad, but three primary causes stand out. Women tend to get paid less than their male counterparts, even if they worked the same job. This continues to this day.  Additionally, women of the generation we tended to work with were limited to careers they could work in, which in many instances, were lower paid.  Finally, during childbearing years, women usually had to quit work or take long periods of unpaid leave.  A triple whammy. Social Security benefits are tied to one’s annual income and lifelong earnings.  So, after decades of work and sacrifices, women tend to have accumulated less Social Security benefits and retirement savings.  Their reward?  Poverty.

The ‘big, beautiful bill’ will add misery to the county, especially to our elderly on fixed limited incomes.  For instance, our elderly clients typically pay Medicare premiums out of their Social Security benefits.  For those that cannot afford Medicare premiums, which I imagine were most of them, there used to be financial assistance through the Medicare Savings Program (MSP).  The beautiful bill cuts or eliminates assistance.  The MSP cuts could force enrollees who earn less than $24K a year to pay an additional $3000 out of pocket for Medicare premiums, potentially $8k if a couple.  Our average client will be devastated economically, to say nothing about the impacts to their health care should they lose Medicare insurance, such as access to prescriptions.  

Speaking of health care, cuts to Medicaid will indirectly impact access to health care for the elderly in rural areas such as Louisa.  Rural hospitals and clinics rely on Medicaid payments to stay in business. Less income will result in closures.  About 17 percent of Louisa residents rely on Medicaid.  Louisa is already a medical care desert as it is, and it will get worse after this bill.  No hospital, no public health clinics (except for Central Virginia Health Services, a non-profit group), and no private urgent care type facilities (not profitable enough for them to come to Louisa).  I imagine that the number of doctor offices we do have will shrink.

Shifting money to the wealthy.  The bill does provide for a senior tax deduction.  If you earn more in income benefits, you can claim a larger tax deduction.  For instance, if you are 65 or older, earn up to $75K, these folks can claim a $6500 tax deduction.  Our typical client would not benefit from this tax deduction at all.  

This senior tax deduction is another way of transferring wealth to older, wealthier folks, and short shifting the young.  Contrast the $6500 senior tax deduction with the $200 dollar increase in childcare tax deduction from $2000 to $2200 per year.  I thought we loved our children.  In Virginia, the average infant childcare cost is $14k per year, about $11K for a four-year-old.  Overall, these types of tax breaks will accelerate the depletion of the Social Security Trust Fund.  Basically, now 2033.  

The bill is big, but it is not beautiful, it is damn ugly, like the spaghetti western, the good, the bad and the ugly.  Mostly the latter two.  It attacks the poor, marginalizes working class women, and transfers immense wealth to the upper classes, leaving many to struggle mightily for safe housing, food security, and access to health care.  About 60 percent of the bill’s financial benefits will go to 20 percent of the population.  12 million folks will lose access to health care insurance.  Millions of working-class folks will lose access to food aid because of “paperwork barriers” designed to reduce the number of enrollees.  Yet, with these “savings” we are going to build a police state through $150 billion in increased funding for DHS agents and a trillion-dollar defense budget.  

Our 5th Congressional District representative John McGuire voted for the bill and issued an ingratiating, bootlicking, suck-up press release fit for North Korea, not America, on the cusp of 250 years of independence from Kings. Like a sucker fish on a shark, McGuire is attached to Trump’s big, beautiful orange ass.

Fisher Chewing Data Center Campus Update: Mineral Supervisor to Vote “NO.”

On a hot and steamy summer evening, Louisa residents gathered at the High School theater to participate in a town hall meeting organized by Mineral Supervisor, and Chairman of the Louisa Board of Supervisors, Duane Adams. I estimate approximately 300 folks attended, representing not only the Mineral district but a broad representation of the whole of Louisa County. The mood light, but pensive, as folks entered and took their seats or milled about chatting with one another.

After brief remarks by Adams, the question session began. From the first question onward, it was clear that the majority opposed the proposed Fisher Chewing Data Center Campus. Questions focused on three main themes: water, power, and projected tax revenues. Skepticism abounded. The questions were not limited to the proposed new data center campus, however, but also focused on the two already approved Amazon Web Service data centers and the newly announced Shannon Hill Road data center near I-64.

In one early exchange, a woman who said she worked professionally as a data center designer and planner, challenged Adams’s assertion that every five years the data center’s hardware, such as servers, would be replaced. By installing new equipment every five years, Adams’s alleged, the business tax revenues would reset, with Louisa County reaping the maximum tax revenue. She said that assumption was flat out wrong.

She has a point, Loudoun County had a $60 million dollar tax shortfall based on this very same faulty assumption regarding a five year replacement cycle. Data centers can depreciate their hardware/equipment which allows them to pay less taxes as the equipment ages. They do not have some magical 5 year replacement cycle and replacement depends on a whole host of complex business reasons, corporate profit being one of them. This holds true for data centers in Louisa.

Adams seemed taken aback, and when she then asked Adams if the proposed data center was going to be a tier 1, 2, 3, or 4 facility, he looked a deer in the headlights, and did not answer, at least not coherently, and continued to talk over her, refusing to let her respond to his remarks, quickly moving on to another questioner. Many in the crowd were not happy with Adam’s silencing tactic, and shouted for her to be able to respond, “let her respond” rang out for a minute or so. She was never permitted to ask another question during the town hall, even though she was promised an opportunity ‘once everyone else had asked their questions.’

Adams talking over women questioners and not letting them finish their questions was a theme throughout the evening, but perhaps that is a topic of another essay.

Nonetheless, this did not deter others from asking pointed questions about noise pollution abatement; carbon offsets, water sources and usage; sewage treatment for contaminated cooling water; fallacies in the tax revenue projections; why a billion dollar corporation needs tax waivers that normal Louisa business do not get (for instance their tax rate on business equipment); number of jobs once construction is over (which Adams wildly over inflated); sources and cost of power (which Adams routinely demurred with the response that power “was not in our control”).

The town hall lasted just short of two hours, with a majority of those wanting to ask questions denied the opportunity to do so were left with the option to submit their questions on a form. In the end, Adams said he would not vote to approve the data center. Adams, from the start of the town hall, said that he was not enthralled by the proposal, but despite that assertion, he seemed overly defensive throughout the question session. One can read from his behavior that perhaps he wasn’t being totally forthright about his doubts about the proposal or was defensive about previous decisions regarding data centers he had made. Nonetheless, he continued, cautioning that he was one of six supervisors, and that folks need to reach out to their respective district supervisors.

Overall, the town hall was an opportunity for the community to speak its collective mind about not only the newly proposed data center, but about data centers in general in Louisa County and their unknown impacts, large and small. Near the end you heard more and more the question, “Why the rush? Why the rush?” I get the sense that folks just want to wait and see the impacts of the first two data centers and not blindly rush into new agreements and contracts, chasing the siren calls of easy tax revenue.

David H. Rogers in His Own Words: Candidate for Louisa County Board of Supervisor.

Democracy is the cornerstone of our Republic.  It is just as important to focus on local elections as it is national elections.  Sometimes, however, local elections get swept up and into national debates and they become sideshows, even though our local elected officials make decisions that impact our lives daily.  To promote local discourse, I intend to highlight persons running in local races, to let them, in their own words, make their case for your vote. 

I recently asked David Rogers if he would be willing to answer three questions about his run for the Mineral seat of the Louisa County Board of Supervisors.  He agreed.  I am pleased to present to you David’s responses to the questions below.

Mr. Rogers is running to replace Duane Adams, who is also the current Chairman of the Board of Supervisors.  Adams term expires December 31 of this year.   

David H. Rogers, Candidate for the Mineral Seat of the Louisa Board of Supervisors

What motivates you to run for the Mineral seat of the Louisa County Board of Supervisors?

First let me say what does not motivate me to run. I am not running because I need something else to do. I am not running because I need to get my name out so I can run for another office. I am not running because I am not happy with what I already do a s a Church Insurance Agent.

I am motivated to run because we have not had good representation with our current board member. We cannot keep doing the same thing and expect a different result. I believe that if people want change, then someone must stand up and fight for it. I would like to be that someone.

I am motivated to run because under the present board, projects have been voted upon that benefit developers and not the people. In negotiating contracts with businesses, we should have a give and take relationship with the Mineral/Louisa residents coming out on the positive end.

I am motivated to run because under the current board member, there is no transparency. The constituents find out about an issue after the fact. This must stop. When Board members move on to other aspirations, we will still be here struggling with the aftermath of bad decisions for many years if we don’t do something now.

What makes you the best candidate for the Mineral seat?

I am the best candidate for the Mineral seat because I realize, “it is not about me.” It is about the people. I have no ulterior motives for running except to help the people of Mineral and Louisa at large. Although I did not grow up in Louisa, I spent my summers here with my grandparents. My family has owned land here for about 130 years. I know that the decisions I make will affect many families including my own.

I CARE about the people in Mineral. I have gotten word that there are homeless people in our Louisa County. This may not be something we want to admit, but it is true. There are groups that are seeking to help these families. There was a ruling that says if churches opened their doors to those who found themselves homeless, the churches could be fined. It is unconscionable to even think about imposing a fine on churches for opening their doors in the freezing cold to those who have found themselves homeless. It is bad enough that our neighbors have had problems resulting in loss of shelter. To have them risk freezing to death is savage. When did we lose our humanity? Whoever even thought to write that down or even think that we could fine a church for doing what the church is called to do, needs a “humanity check”. We need to assist as much as possible.

I believe I must be transparent and keep the people informed. We found out, after the fact, that data centers would be coming to the Mineral/Louisa area. I also noticed that zones in the town of Mineral were changing from commercial to residential to commercial on a whim. Who did this benefit? The developers. The people may not have agreed with this.

A proposal was made for a truck stop to be developed in the Cuckoo district. If it had not been for the people of Cuckoo, coming out twice in full force in the rain after their private meetings, it may have passed. A truck stop would have brought more crime to our county, in the form of drug and human trafficking along with prostitution.

Most of all, I want to hear what the people need and want so I can include them in making the best decisions for all. Many of the issues I mentioned above were shot through before the people got a chance to digest them. It is my goal to always put the people first. That means having regular communication using the best means possible to keep the people informed. Communication with my neighbors will be of the utmost importance to me.

What challenges will Mineral in particular, and Louisa County in general, face in the next three to five years? How would you address them?

Problems with our roads

Many of our roads are receiving traffic they were not built to handle. I am speaking of the eighteen-wheeler tractor trailers. These heavy trucks travel on the curving roads and chew up the road shoulders. It is hard to see around the curves so crossing the road to get to a mailbox is unsafe for our citizens, especially the elderly. Trucks also present a safety issue while traveling on these single lane narrow roads. Some roads were made for this type of traffic but there are no signs to encourage trucks to use them. This will only get worse as our population increases. Maintenance is also an issue. Strict guidelines will need to be followed to keep large trucks on the appropriate roads when driving through our locality.

There is also a need to study traffic signals at the busy intersections to keep the traffic flowing, especially around the busy hours of the day.

 Problems with data centers

The present Board of Supervisors have already voted to have data centers come to our county. These centers take up a lot of resources like land, water and electrical power. This will result in brown outs and black outs because of the increased stress on our old power grids. There have been no plans to upgrade the electrical grids in the Louisa area. I am told that upgrades have not been done since the 1970’s when the power plant was built. Based on our population and current usage, the area would not be able to sustain added pull on our old system. We may have put the cart before the horse and need to take a side-step before moving forward with like projects. Truth be told, better planning could remedy this.

As mentioned, the roads will need to be upgraded to handle the heavy truck traffic during the construction of the data centers. The construction will take several years.

Keeping Louisa balanced between rural and metropolitan

I know many of the residents in Louisa have come here because they like the rural atmosphere. This is something I want to preserve and in my discussions with many of my neighbors, they feel the same way. Are we following the standards that would keep Mineral/Louisa rural? We need to revisit these standards before we become too metropolitan. Sustained growth is good, but we must do it in a way that we do not take away our rural lifestyle.

Having adequate housing to support our residents

We need to negotiate with developers to build housing that is affordable. The housing needs to be affordable for people we want to attract to our area like new teachers, just out of college, new emergency personnel, and other recent college graduates. We are already lacking in these areas.

Having businesses to support living in Mineral/Louisa

We need to attract businesses that will train and employ the people in Mineral/Louisa. Louisa County High School has many excellent programs that train our students. We need businesses to capitalize on their career training if so desired, they do not have to leave home.

Having adequate resources to keep Mineral/Louisa safe for all its residents

Louisa has a growing elderly population. We need an Urgent Care Center in the heart of Louisa (not close to the county borders) that all our county people, especially our elderly, can reach quickly. The center could have medical personnel to initiate treatment and to be able to stabilize a person in an emergency and to prepare them for transport. It could also provide preventive care and medical education. Having after-hours care would be of benefit because you know children don’t get sick until after dark.

These are just a few things. Please know that I am always open to discussion about any concerns of the people in Mineral/Louisa. I am David H. Rogers. I can be reached at rogersdh97@gmail.com.